<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange Activesync comparison Windows Mobile and iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews Of Mobile Phones, UK Networks and Software</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>rather than going for a expensive downloaded app, why not simply go for a reasonable subscription based web app which is much richer? All this exchange activesync debate makes sense only for those companies which already have exchange. for smaller companies, for whom exchange is unaffordable for the most part, such limited functionality is an added disincentive. a much better alternative is to try &lt;a HREF="http://iphone.hyperoffice.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; exchange alternatives for the iPhone &lt;/A&gt;  like HyperOffice which are inexpensive, uncomplicated and frankly offer you much much more robust functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rather than going for a expensive downloaded app, why not simply go for a reasonable subscription based web app which is much richer? All this exchange activesync debate makes sense only for those companies which already have exchange. for smaller companies, for whom exchange is unaffordable for the most part, such limited functionality is an added disincentive. a much better alternative is to try <a href="http://iphone.hyperoffice.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/iphone.hyperoffice.com');" rel="nofollow"> exchange alternatives for the iPhone </a>  like HyperOffice which are inexpensive, uncomplicated and frankly offer you much much more robust functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exchange Activesync comparison Windows Mobile and iPhone &#171; Michael Herald&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Exchange Activesync comparison Windows Mobile and iPhone &#171; Michael Herald&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-462</guid>
		<description>[...] via MobileTechAddicts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via MobileTechAddicts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone 3G and MobileMe up&#8217;s and down&#8217;s &#171; David Knight&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone 3G and MobileMe up&#8217;s and down&#8217;s &#171; David Knight&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiletechaddicts.com/2008/07/19/exchange-activesync-comparison-windows-mobile-and-iphone/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>[...] Exchange Activesync comparison Windows Mobile and iPhone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exchange Activesync comparison Windows Mobile and iPhone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.782 seconds -->
